ザ・外人問題、ウンコ外人、クソ外人、ヘンタイ外人、嫌い外人、怖い外人、汚い外人、臭い外人、野蛮外人 外人出ていけ！にっぽん第一！
それについて何を書けばいいの？🤣
Sie gehören alle in den After ge*ickt、x6、だよね。🤣
令和7年7月22日
ザ・外人 亜
令和7年7月29日アップデート：
「AV女優が使ったドレスは着たくない」は「黒人の泳いだプールには入りたくない」と同じだよ。まともな人間なら口にはしない。
https://x.com/BugsGroove/status/1949637843426718063
ゥチ 黒人っていうか南米とハーフなんだけど、これに5万いいねついてて絶望
これも差別って言われたらそれまでだけど、なんで生まれ持った人種とAV女優っていう仕事を同列にして語るわけ⁉️😭😭 普段どうせ人種差別に興味無いだろうからこういうばっかり黒人のこと引き合いに出すのマジでやめてね
https://x.com/Y4V7c/status/1949820615927455878
穢多非人などの血族差別が皮革加工業など特定の職業差別に端を発してることを知ってればこんなこと口が裂けても言えないはずなんですけどね。そもそも職業は自由選択できるという前提からしてだいぶ疑わしいわけで。19世紀レベルの差別意識を令和に持ち込まないでほしい。
https://x.com/Segah02457547/status/1950107762731422064
令和7年8月28日アップデート：
光源氏🇯🇵
@hikaruganji
もう正直に言います。日本人は外国人にうんざりしています。母国に帰って下さい。
日本人1億人以上の民意です。
I’ll be honest. Japanese people are fed up with foreigners. Please go back to your home country.
This is the will of the Japanese people, over 100 million strong.
〜〜
トシ🇯🇵
@WpYRnmCg9A83851
中国人
朝鮮人
クルド人
ベトナム人
その他外国人が増え過ぎてウンザリしている💢
もう
外国人は嫌いだ💢
鎖国したい！
Chinese people
Korean people
Kurdish people
Vietnamese people
I’m sick and tired of there being too many other foreigners 💢
I’m done
I hate foreigners 💢
I want to close the country off!
https://x.com/WpYRnmCg9A83851/status/1960583989720441228
Link_https://x.com/WpYRnmCg9A83851/status/1960583989720441228
https://x.com/hikaruganji/status/1960567839196373218
Link_https://x.com/hikaruganji/status/1960567839196373218
(end of up-date)
アップデート：
日本の総人口約1億2433万人 55万人減少【都道府県別データも】
2025年8月6日 18時05分
日本人の人口 減少数・減少率ともに最大
国内に住む外国人の人口 調査開始以降最多 増加数も最大
【都道府県別 外国人人口】
外国人の人口は
▽東京都が最も多く72万1223人
▽大阪府 32万8128人
▽愛知県 32万1905人
▽神奈川県 28万4889人
▽埼玉県 25万7656人となっていて、
上位5つの都府県で全体の半数以上を占めています。
一方、最も少ないのは
▽秋田県 5753人
▽鳥取県 6005人
▽高知県 6661人
▽青森県 8415人
▽徳島県 8769人などとなっています。
外国人の人口は、47都道府県すべてで増加しました。
人口増加数が最も多いのは
▽東京都で7万3807人、次いで▽大阪府 3万1549人、▽埼玉県 2万7422人などとなっています。
一方、増加数が最も少ないのは
▽鳥取県 496人、次いで▽秋田県 531人、▽高知県695人などとなっています。
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20250806/k10014886001000.html
日本人、減少数・率が過去最大 外国人367万人 人口動態調査
毎日新聞、2025/8/6
総務省は6日、住民基本台帳に基づく2025年1月1日現在の人口動態調査を発表した。国内の日本人の人口は1億2065万3227人で、前年に比べ90万8574人（0・75％）減った。減少は16年連続で、減少数、減少率ともに1968年の調査開始以降で最大だった。一方、外国人の人口は過去最多の367万7463人で、前年比35万4089人（10・65％）増。増加数は13年の調査開始以降で最大だった。
日本人人口のうち死亡者数から出生者数を差し引いた「自然減」は人口減少の主な要因とされており、過去最大の91万2161人減となった。24年1年間の死亡者数は159万9850人と過去最多。出生者数は68万7689人で最も少なく、初めて70万人を割った。海外からの転入者と転出者の差などを示す「社会増減」は3587人増だった。
日本人と外国人を合わせた総人口は、前年比55万4485人（0・44％）減の1億2433万690人だった。
東京、名古屋、関西の3大都市圏の人口が全体に占める割合は53・09％で、前年より0・21ポイント増え、13年連続で増加し、過去最高を更新した。
都道府県別では、東京都が9万632人（0・65％）増、千葉県が1421人（0・02％）増で、総人口が減少傾向にある中、首都圏への一極集中が改めて浮き彫りとなった。他の道府県は減少し、最も減少率が大きかったのは秋田県の1・84％減だった。減少率2位は青森県の1・64％減、3位は高知県の1・59％減だった。
全国の世帯数は6128万7994世帯で前年比50万8853世帯（0・84％）増。1世帯の平均人数は2・03人で0・02人減った。
日本人のうち65歳以上の高齢者は3569万2697人で、前年から減少に転じた。「生産年齢人口」に当たる15～64歳は7123万5169人。14歳以下は1372万5356人で、調査開始以降、31年連続で減少した。人口構成は65歳以上が29・58％、15～64歳が59・04％、14歳以下が11・38％だった。
外国人は新型コロナウイルスの感染拡大が落ち着いてきたことを背景に3年連続で増え、全都道府県で増加した。最も増えたのは東京都の7万3807人。増加率では北海道の19・57％増が最も大きく、宮崎県（18・28％増）、佐賀県（16・39％増）と続いた。
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20250806/k00/00m/010/281000c
Up-date 2025/9/1
Japan to launch broad review of immigration policies amid rise in foreign nationals
Aug 29, 2025
The government is set to begin a fundamental review of its immigration policy, including whether to impose caps, as Japan sees the number of foreign nationals increase rapidly, according to a report released Friday by Justice Minister Keisuke Suzuki.
A new task force is expected to be established soon in order to conduct surveys on the impacts of rising foreign resident numbers, with the findings to be used in shaping future immigration policies.
The main concern, according to the report, is to prevent social division between foreign nationals and citizens, as seen in other Group of Seven developed nations. Caps on foreign nationals coming into the country may be considered “if signs emerge that friction has exceeded tolerable levels,” the report says.
“Other countries have struggled with integration, leading in many cases to social division or political turmoil. Japan, too, must prepare early,” Suzuki said during a news conference Friday.
Since February, the minister has held a series of private meetings with academics familiar with immigration policies to identify key issues regarding the acceptance of foreign nationals. The interim report, completed after six months of debate, points out that “as the proportion of foreign nationals rises, the impact on Japanese society will grow, and various complex challenges may arise.”
“We are currently facing population decline, and at the same time, foreign resident numbers are increasing at an accelerating pace,” he added. “With the foreign resident percentage projected to reach 10%, it is essential to forecast and analyze what kind of society and economy Japan will become, and to examine our fundamental approach to foreign resident policy.”
Foreign residents currently make up just 2.82% of Japan’s population, but the figure is projected to reach 10.8% by 2070. However, declining birthrates and the rising number of foreign residents could accelerate that timeline. The number of births in Japan in 2024 fell below 690,000, a level that had not been expected until 2039, according to the report.
Meanwhile, the number of foreign residents has surged in recent years, increasing 300,000 annually since the end of the pandemic, and topping 350,000 in 2024.
“Until now, there has been little strategic debate on the necessity or limits of accepting foreign residents, or on frameworks for quantitative management and system adjustments,” Suzuki added. “That is our key concern.”
The report released Friday stresses that Japan is at a turning point and that current ad-hoc measures on immigration are no longer sufficient.
The report identifies seven categories that need to be discussed in regards to foreign immigration: economic growth, industrial policy, labor policy, taxation and social security, community life, public safety and immigration control.
Without “unified long-term policy,” increases in foreign residents could significantly affect daily life in Japan, including wages, working conditions, social security systems and public safety, the report warns.
It recommends building multiple economic growth scenarios based on different scales of intake of foreign nationals, clarifying the roles of national and local governments and establishing programs to better integrate them into society to ease friction in communities with growing foreign populations.
The report also proposed strengthening immigration measures and oversight, introducing electronic travel authorization by 2028, reducing the average screening process for applicants seeking asylum to six months by 2030, expanding deportation capacity and tightening crackdowns on those working illegally.
With regards to business, student and professional visa categories, the report outlined reforms and urged closer coordination between the Immigration Services Agency and the Justice Ministry, which separately deal with approval of permanent residency and naturalization.
The report also called for the need to consider what would happen if Japan caps the number of specified skilled workers and less skilled workers aimed at becoming skilled workers under a new training program to be launched in fiscal 2027.
“Safeguarding the safety and security of Japanese citizens must remain the government’s top priority,” the report says. “Japan must work toward true coexistence with foreign nationals, while preparing for an era when foreign nationals comprise 10% of the population.”
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/08/29/japan/society/immigration-policy-report/
up-date 2025/9/18
あき
@aki_yattemiru
今、寿司屋にいるが、アフリカ人客の体臭で他の日本人客が全員出て行った😭 私も出る！
8:17 AM · Sep 17, 2025 ·9.1M Views
I’m at a sushi restaurant right now, but the body odor of the African customer made all the other Japanese customers leave 😭 I’m leaving too!
https://x.com/aki_yattemiru/status/1968091930115592398
up-date 2025/10/13
DANNY JIN
@DANNYJIN
japanese × Palestinian 🇵🇸
Artist
mail me for booking or interview
取材やブッキングはメールまで
hojicha.crew@gmail.com
https://linktr.ee/dannyjinhojicha
各種ストリーミングサイト配信中
ArtistTokyo-to, JapanJoined July 2023
245 Following
4,295 Followers
https://x.com/DANNYJIN
Verse
最近外人ばかりって俺にいわれても
2005年生まれた時から俺はここにいる
子供の頃は外人なんてそう滅多にいなくて
常に目で指を指されているような気分
電車乗ったらジロジロ
すれ違う人に覗かれる顔
知らない人から挨拶はハロー
向けられた眼光
笑った顔で返した、
視線の理由がわかるまで
中指立てて返した、
受け入れて諦めるまで
今でも覚えてる子供のとき
だにーは日本人じゃない
悪気ない純粋な子供の言葉
が教えた
ハーフじゃないよ君はダブル
そんなんのは綺麗事ミラクル
俺達は常に狭間の中で生きてる
勘違いすんな
今に始まったんじゃねぇこれは
国籍に母親、育ちに生まれは
日本でも 違う顔
俺はあいつらが言い出す前から
自分に言い聞かしてた
こんなこと気にすんな同胞
Hook
君に言われなくてもわかるのさ
俺はずっとここじゃセカンドでさ
全てしって諦めついたから
笑顔で子供手を振るんだ
皆が言わなくてもわかるから
俺はずっとここじゃセカンドでさ
ビートの上では いつもなぜか
まだ 立てる指 一つだけさ
2nd verse
中坊の時から、うざかったこの国が
無能な民に政治家 さっさと出てやりたかった
けどラッパーになって
ツアーで色んなとこにいって、色んな人と色んな飯を食って色んな夜を過ごして
日本はこんなにもいいところがあるんだって
好きになってきたころ
思い出して我に返る
最近は人の目からヘイトを感じる
俺が大人になったのか、この国が幼稚になったのか
「調子乗るな外人」
「嫌なら国に帰れ」
仲間思い出ここにあっても
敵になる投票所
内にできた
痛い痛いを紙飛行機にし飛ばして
涙枯らす代わりに この気持ちを枯らした
すれ違う人に笑顔でハローって返せるようになった 子供の時みたいに
自分を日本人と呼ぶのは止めた
あなたはファースト
俺はセカンド
俺のホームはどこにあるの
Hook
2025年10月24日のアップデート
Multicultural inclusivity and regulation key to Japan’s foreigner policy: Gunma gov.
October 22, 2025 (Mainichi Japan)
Japan is facing major debate regarding policies related to foreigners, including foreign workers, refugees and inbound tourists. The House of Councillors election this past July saw the rise of the populist party Sanseito, which ran under a “Japanese First” slogan during the campaign, and candidates in the recent Liberal Democratic Party (LDP)’s leadership race all called for stricter policies on foreign nationals.
How should Japan approach its relationship with foreigners? How can a society based on coexistence be realized? The Mainichi Shimbun recently spoke with Gunma Gov. Ichita Yamamoto to discuss the prefecture’s efforts in balancing multicultural coexistence and regulation. Below are excerpts of Yamamoto’s comments:
—
Gunma Prefecture’s “basic plan for promoting multicultural coexistence and co-creation” centers on the vision of a “self-reliant and decentralized society” where all residents — regardless of age, gender, nationality or disability — can be happy. This vision has a clear direction toward building multicultural coexistence as a foundational element of society.
Over the past six years as governor, however, I have found how challenging this vision is to achieve. Already, the regional economy cannot go on without foreign residents, who support many sectors including construction, agriculture, caregiving and manufacturing. At the same time, there are persistent concerns among residents about illegal employment and public safety.
Foreigner policy and illegal work issues have become major topics in national politics, as seen in the LDP leadership election. Opinions advocating for regulation of foreigners and maintaining order are spreading even among moderate conservatives and are becoming a widespread sentiment in society. Supporting foreigners who follow the rules while firmly dealing with those who do not is essential for pursuing both coexistence and regulation simultaneously.
To achieve this, it is crucial for the national government to communicate a reliable basic policy. Without a coherent philosophy guiding foreigner policy from acceptance to coexistence, local governments are forced to make independent decisions. While it goes without saying that we should not foster xenophobia, the national government should provide clear guidelines on building communities with law-abiding foreign residents. Establishing a basic law could be considered. I want the state to create an environment where the central government builds a system based on which local governments can implement policies.
Looking outside Japan, successful examples of locals living in harmony with foreign residents are rare. Immigration issues are serious overseas as well, and, especially in Europe, divisions are deepening. These realities highlight that multicultural coexistence cannot be achieved through ideals alone. In the Gunma Prefecture town of Oizumi, once considered a “model of multicultural coexistence,” I have heard that there are cases where families get isolated from the community due to the parents not understanding Japanese and children also struggling with both their native language and Japanese.
According to a Gunma Prefecture survey, over 70% of foreign residents expressed a desire to interact with Japanese people, while only about 10% of Japanese residents felt the same. If this asymmetry widens, societal division is inevitable. Therefore, it is crucial to familiarize children with different cultures from an early age. I believe having even one friend from a different cultural background is incredibly important. Such accumulation of interactions lays the foundation for a society of coexistence.
Gunma Prefecture hosts the “Karakkaze Park” cultural event every October during its “multicultural coexistence and co-creation promotion month.” Organized by students and foreign resident groups, the event fosters understanding of different cultures among children through music, dance and sports, aiming to share this philosophy through experience.
Efforts are also underway to establish an orderly society living with foreigners. In September, the Gunma Prefectural Government signed a declaration to stop illegal employment with 11 local industry associations. This demonstrates a clear stance that in Gunma, the government and industry work together to protect law-abiding foreigners while rejecting illegal employment.
Japan has expanded its acceptance of foreigners despite claiming not to have an immigration policy. While some political parties in the upper house election advocated for restricting foreigner acceptance, it is crucial to calmly examine whether such measures are feasible in Japan in the first place. Determining the appropriate ratio of foreigners to balance social stability and economic growth requires scientific analysis.
Harmonious existence with different cultures is no longer just an ideal but a matter of national survival. I have begun researching how to design an appropriate “scale” for the foreign resident ratio. The national and local governments need to collaborate to reconstruct society while balancing coexistence and regulation. I aim to fulfill the responsibility for this goal from the local level.
https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20251022/p2a/00m/0na/010000c
論点
外国人政策の行方
毎日新聞 2025/10/22
外国人労働者や難民の受け入れ、インバウンド（訪日観光客）など外国人を巡る政策が大きな争点となっている。参院選では「日本人ファースト」を掲げた参政党が躍進し、自民党総裁選では候補者がそろって外国人政策の厳格化を主張した。日本は外国人とどう向き合うべきか。共生社会はどうすれば実現できるのだろうか。
国民的合意に基づき立法 山脇啓造・明治大教授
日本における外国人の受け入れを巡る議論は、しばしばすれ違いを見せています。その最大の理由は、「外国人政策」という言葉の定義が広すぎる点にあります。観光客の話と労働者の話、さらには不動産売買など、性質の異なる分野までが同じ枠で語られるため、議論がかみ合っていません。
この記事は有料記事です。 残り3649文字（全文3952文字）
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20251022/ddm/004/070/014000c
How should Japan respond to rising foreign resident numbers? An expert weighs in
October 20, 2025
TOKYO — In the recent ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) leadership race, all five candidates — including eventual winner, former Economic Security Minister Sanae Takaichi — called for stricter policies regarding foreigners.
Following the July House of Councillors election, where the “Japanese First” Sanseito party made gains, Japan’s policy on foreigners become a major point of contention in the LDP presidential election. But when politicians focus only on tightening regulations, they risk fueling xenophobia. With the number of foreign residents in Japan increasing, what kind of approach is needed? The Mainichi Shimbun spoke with Naoko Hashimoto, associate professor at International Christian University and an expert on foreigner policies.
Mainichi: In the LDP leadership race, all five candidates, including Takaichi, called for stricter foreigner policies.
Naoko Hashimoto: They are trying to project an image of being “tough on foreigners who don’t follow the rules.” Of course, in a country of laws, illegal acts should be dealt with regardless of nationality, and steps should be taken to prevent them. But it is simply not the case that enforcement is not functioning specifically when it comes to foreigners.
Illegal overstays are often highlighted, but the current number is just a quarter of the peak. The figure — just over 70,000 — is far lower than in Europe or the U.S. Considering that about 40 million people, including tourists, enter Japan each year, Japan’s border management is in fact working well.
That the candidates reiterated the talking points of even the conventional LDP’s conservative wing was likely a reaction to the surge of the “Japan First” Sanseito party in the July upper house election. Still, I think their understanding is somewhat off.
The LDP government has accepted many foreign workers to make up for labor shortages, but has dodged questions by saying, “This isn’t an immigration policy.” The systems for Japanese people and foreign residents living together in society are half-baked, and explanations to the public have been insufficient. I think this has led to some voters losing trust and moving away from the LDP.
M: So that’s not really the issue we should be focusing on now?
NH: Currently, foreigners make up 3% of the population, but Justice Minister Keisuke Suzuki has projected that “by around 2040, it could reach 10%.” We need to start discussing now how to smoothly transition to such a society.
In August, a private study group led by the justice minister released a summary of issues regarding foreigner acceptance, emphasizing the need to consider “social integration” for a society where everyone lives together. This direction is important.
M: So what specific policies are needed to help foreigners integrate into local communities?
NH: First, foreigners need to learn Japanese. They also need to learn about Japanese laws, culture, rules and norms.
To live in Japan long-term, being able to communicate in Japanese is essential. It’s also important for self-fulfillment and for protecting one’s rights against exploitation by employers. We need to build a system for Japanese language education. The question is how to fund it — through public money, personal contributions or both. Until now, NPOs and local governments have taken the lead, and cooperation with them will remain vital. The roles and responsibilities of the national government, local governments and employers must be clarified.
To teach norms, among other things, we need to provide opportunities for cultural orientation. We should decide who will run these programs, clearly explain what is expected, and make the information easy to understand. We also need to motivate foreigners to participate.
M: Some politicians argue that Japan should limit the number of foreigners it accepts.
NH: In reality, there has never been unlimited acceptance. The “Specified Skilled Worker (i)” status introduced six years ago, and the new training employment system set to replace Japan’s technical intern training program in two years, both have caps.
At the same time, from a social integration perspective we need to clarify what level of Japanese language ability is required at entry and after arrival for each visa status. This should be worked out in consultation with industries.
Labor shortages due to population decline are severe, especially in rural areas. Foreigners are essential to sustaining Japan’s social security system. That is a fundamental policy premise.
M: Japan is still reluctant to accept refugees, lagging far behind Europe and the United States.
NH: While the recent revision of the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act has effectively limited the number of times one can apply for refugee status, the creation of refugee determination guidelines two years ago was a step forward. It’s been over 40 years since Japan joined the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. I hope the guidelines will continue to be updated as needed. It’s crucial that what’s written in the guidelines is actually implemented in real refugee determinations.
The introduction of a “complementary protection” system is also a positive step, as it guarantees almost the same rights as those granted to recognized refugees.
I do have concerns about the revised immigration act, but if Japan had first implemented refugee assessments in line with the guidelines for a few years and ensured that those who should be protected were protected, there would have been less criticism.
It’s also disappointing that Japan’s “third-country resettlement” program, which accepts refugees from neighboring countries in Asia, is still limited to just a few dozen people a year.
When the Taliban took control of the Afghan capital Kabul in 2021, Japan failed to rescue most of the local staff who had worked for the Japanese government. I believe this was a loss for Japan’s national interests.
M: Online, baseless criticism of foreigners is rampant, and there are concerns about growing xenophobia. What is needed for Japanese and foreigners to live together as neighbors?
NH: People tend to distrust those they can’t communicate with. If residents don’t know what foreigners are thinking, their sense of caution increases. That’s why Japanese language education is needed.
When I was in the United Kingdom, I saw a TV program where a far-right individual, after cheering for a sports team alongside Muslims they disliked, ended up saying they were good guys. This is an example of “contact theory” — spending time together and getting to know each other reduces fear. I think it’s good to create opportunities for daily interaction, like picking up trash together or participating in disaster drills.
I also think overtourism is fueling some of the resentment toward foreigners. Measures like separating routes for tourists and locals during commuting times could help.
M: Japan has only recently begun full-fledged acceptance of foreigners.
NH: Other countries have accumulated both successes and failures, and there is a wealth of knowledge to draw from. In Japan, municipalities like Hamamatsu, Shizuoka Prefecture, Toyota in Aichi Prefecture, and Oizumi in Gunma Prefecture have long had large foreign populations. We should learn from municipalities with experience.
https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20251017/p2a/00m/0op/048000c
「国境管理はうまくいっている」 外国人政策厳格化論にもの申す識者
毎日新聞 2025/10/6
自民党の総裁室の椅子に座る高市早苗新総裁＝同党本部で2025年10月4日午後7時2分、渡部直樹撮影
高市早苗前経済安全保障担当相が選出された自民党総裁選では、各候補が外国人政策の厳格化を主張した。「日本人ファースト」を掲げる参政党が躍進した7月の参院選に続き、主要な論点に挙がった。ただ、政治家が規制強化ばかりを強調することは、排外的な風潮をあおりかねない。日本で暮らす外国人が増加する中、どのような対応が求められているのか。外国人政策に詳しい橋本直子・国際基督教大准教授に聞いた。【聞き手・北村和巳】
――自民党総裁選では、高市氏をはじめ5人の候補者がそろって外国人政策の厳格化を主張しました。
◆「ルールを守らない外国人に自分は厳しいんだ」という姿勢をアピールしている。違法な行為があれば国籍問わず取り締まり、起きないようにすることは法治国家として当然だ。だが、そうした対応が外国人に限って機能していないという状況ではない。
不法滞在が問題にされているが、ピーク時の4分の1にとどまる。7万人余りという数は欧米に比べて格段に少ない。インバウンド（観光客）も含めて年間約4000万人が来日していることを考えれば、日本の国境管理はうまくいっていると言える。
従来の自民党の中でも保守派の主張だったことを候補者が繰り返しているのは、7月の参院選で「日本人ファースト」を掲げた参政党が…
この記事は有料記事です。 残り2231文字（全文2772文字）
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20251005/k00/00m/010/153000c
—-